>>1593794its a lot more than just that my dear adolf
its arguably the logical extension of 20th century classical. it certainly shares the complexity, if not in form, then in harmony, melody, rhythm, timbre and any other memeword you can think of to explain music. the good timeline, as it were, where we didnt descend into fullretard post-modern wankery
while all the retards were over there wanking over schoenberg or whatever jew making a math equation into a
shit sounding composition, duke and trane and mingus and all those guys were pouring over satie, debussy, ravel. and you might be surprised the degree of crosspollination. i know ravel in particular wrote several of my favorite pieces after spending time overseas going to clubs in harlem during the renaissance
i feel like jazzers were possibly the only ones in the entire musical world who understood the impact of not only the belle epoch, but also dada, futurism, cubism, and all the other fuckin artfag movements in yurop that were pushing art in the early 20th. and moreover tsome of em even knew how to apply it so it wasnt JUST pointless wankery. yurop of course just decided to kys itself and make gay art about politics and gommunism etc as they do
but the jazzers were like, wait no, i can fix her.
and id argue they did